Re: Commitfest Manager - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Commitfest Manager
Date
Msg-id Y/W9dtgFvCz8GOib@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Commitfest Manager  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 02:13:08PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> writes:
>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 12:29, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> writes:
>>> We've generally thought that the manager for the last CF of a cycle
>>> needs to be someone with experience.
>
>> Hm. Was that in response to the first paragraph or the second? :)
>
> The first ;-).  Sorry if I wasn't clear.

The last CF is the most sensitive one as the feature freeze would
happen just around the beginning of April, so the CFM has a bit more
pressure in taking the correct decisions, if need be.

FYI, I'd prefer spend cycles at patches that could make the cut,
rather than doing the classification of the whole.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT
Next
From: Andrey Chudnovsky
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER