Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?
Date
Msg-id Y+V6Ic3kSEZ4vXKj@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 08:15:21AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> For the record, according to [1] it's not necessary to use
> --reset-author when back-patching.  (Maybe a little confusingly,
> because it's not quite clear whether our policies consider the author
> field to be meaningful or not.)
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1347459696.16215.11.camel%40vanquo.pezone.net

Oops, sorry about that.  Using --reset-author is a habit when it comes
to backpatch.  It looks like my mistake when back-patching something
only to stable branches.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_usleep for multisecond delays
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Importing pg_bsd_indent into our source tree