Re: Proposed patch for key managment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Proposed patch for key managment
Date
Msg-id X9lWho7MUmppfVO0@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposed patch for key managment  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: Proposed patch for key managment
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Stephen,

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 02:09:09PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Yeah, looking at what's been done there seems like the right approach to
> me as well, ideally we'd have one set of APIs that'll support all these
> use cases (not unlike what curl does..).

Ooh...  This is interesting.  What did curl do wrong here?  It is
always good to hear from such past experiences.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Minor documentation error regarding streaming replication protocol
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior