On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 10:51:00AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Good catch. It is very easy to miss that this is not "rm", but "sn".
> I have checked the rest of this area and did not notice similar
> errors. I'll backpatch the attached if there are no objections.
Applied this one with 643428c & co.
--
Michael