Sv: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Joseph Krogh
Subject Sv: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date
Msg-id VisenaEmail.56.6d12f3dd58dcac69.168b0276109@tc7-visena
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
På lørdag 02. februar 2019 kl. 20:01:01, skrev Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
[snip]
There's nothing particularly stopping us from accepting
"materialized" with a D in this syntax, instead of or in addition
to "materialize"; though I hesitate to mention it for fear of
another round of bikeshedding.
 
+1 for keeping it "imperative-style" – MATERIALIZE – consistent with other SQL-stuff.
 
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Refactoring IndexPath representation of index conditions
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb --allow-group-access behaviour in windows