Re: How to optimize WHERE column_a IS NOT NULL OR column_b = 'value' - Mailing list pgsql-sql
From | Andreas Joseph Krogh |
---|---|
Subject | Re: How to optimize WHERE column_a IS NOT NULL OR column_b = 'value' |
Date | |
Msg-id | VisenaEmail.4c.3e4b549ec93661eb.147c6b40d3e@tc7-on Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: How to optimize WHERE column_a IS NOT NULL OR column_b = 'value' (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: How to optimize WHERE column_a IS NOT NULL OR column_b = 'value'
|
List | pgsql-sql |
På mandag 11. august 2014 kl. 21:34:57, skrev Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>:
Hi2014-08-11 18:01 GMT+02:00 Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>:Hi folks,I have the following schema (simplified for this example).create table folder(id integer primary key, name varchar not null);create table document(id serial primary key, name varchar not null, owner_id integer not null, folder_id integer references folder(id));create index document_owner_idx ON document(owner_id);create index document_folder_idx ON document(folder_id);insert into folder(id, name) values(1, 'Folder A');insert into folder(id, name) values(2, 'Folder B');insert into document(name, owner_id, folder_id) values('Document A', 1, 1);insert into document(name, owner_id, folder_id) values('Document B', 1, NULL);insert into document(name, owner_id, folder_id) values('Document C', 2, 2);insert into document(name, owner_id, folder_id) values('Document D', 2, NULL);FROM document doc left outer join folder f ON doc.folder_id = f.idWHERE doc.folder_id is not null OR doc.owner_id = 1;QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.15..13.77 rows=4 width=76) (actual time=0.031..0.045 rows=3 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on document doc (cost=0.00..1.05 rows=4 width=44) (actual time=0.012..0.018 rows=3 loops=1)
Filter: ((folder_id IS NOT NULL) OR (owner_id = 1))
Rows Removed by Filter: 1
-> Index Scan using folder_pkey on folder f (cost=0.15..3.17 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=0.005..0.006 rows=1 loops=3)
Index Cond: (doc.folder_id = id)
Planning time: 0.267 ms
Execution time: 0.094 ms
(8 rows)Is the a way to write a query which uses an index efficiently for such a schema?I'd like to eliminate the Filter: ((folder_id IS NOT NULL) OR (owner_id = 1)) and rather have "index cond" insted, is that possible?your example is partially broken - ANALYZE and hashjoin and seqscan penalization are missing - index scan is not used due too small table sizes
I tested 9.5, probably same as 9.4 and there indexes are used
postgres=# set enable_hashjoin to off;
SET
Time: 0.473 ms
postgres=# set enable_seqscan to off;
SET
Time: 0.904 ms
postgres=# explain select f.id, f.name, doc.id, doc.owner_id, doc.name
FROM document doc left outer join folder f ON doc.folder_id = f.id
WHERE doc.folder_id is not null OR doc.owner_id = 1;
QUERY PLAN
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Merge Left Join (cost=0.26..24.38 rows=3 width=32)
Merge Cond: (doc.folder_id = f.id)
-> Index Scan using document_folder_idx on document doc (cost=0.13..12.20 rows=3 width=23)
Filter: ((folder_id IS NOT NULL) OR (owner_id = 1))
-> Index Scan using folder_pkey on folder f (cost=0.13..12.16 rows=2 width=13)
Planning time: 0.663 ms
(6 rows)
default 9.2, 9.3, ...
postgres=# explain select f.id, f.name, doc.id, doc.owner_id, doc.name
FROM document doc left outer join folder f ON doc.folder_id = f.id
WHERE doc.folder_id is not null OR doc.owner_id = 1;
QUERY PLAN
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Hash Left Join (cost=1.04..2.12 rows=3 width=32)
Hash Cond: (doc.folder_id = f.id)
-> Seq Scan on document doc (cost=0.00..1.05 rows=3 width=23)
Filter: ((folder_id IS NOT NULL) OR (owner_id = 1))
-> Hash (cost=1.02..1.02 rows=2 width=13)
-> Seq Scan on folder f (cost=0.00..1.02 rows=2 width=13)
(6 rows)
and 9.2 after hashjoin and indexscan penalization
postgres=# explain select f.id, f.name, doc.id, doc.owner_id, doc.name
FROM document doc left outer join folder f ON doc.folder_id = f.id
WHERE doc.folder_id is not null OR doc.owner_id = 1;
QUERY PLAN
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Merge Left Join (cost=0.00..24.62 rows=3 width=32)
Merge Cond: (doc.folder_id = f.id)
-> Index Scan using document_folder_idx on document doc (cost=0.00..12.32 rows=3 width=23)
Filter: ((folder_id IS NOT NULL) OR (owner_id = 1))
-> Index Scan using folder_pkey on folder f (cost=0.00..12.28 rows=2 width=13)
(5 rows)
Time: 2.258 ms
What is your PostgreSQL?
Regards
Pavel
P.S. ten years ago I had a similar issue - "OR" predikates can be replaced by UNION
you can try:
SELECT * FROM(SELECT * FROM doc
WHERE folder_id IS NOT NULLUNIONSELECT * FROM docWHERE owner_id = 1) sLEFT JOIN folder ON s.folder_id = folder.id
or some similar magic
I see turning enable_seqscan to off results in BitmapOr in 9.3:
loff=# select version();
version
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 9.3.2 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-10ubuntu9) 4.8.1, 64-bit
(1 row)
version
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 9.3.2 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-10ubuntu9) 4.8.1, 64-bit
(1 row)
loff=# show enable_seqscan ;
enable_seqscan
----------------
off
(1 row)
enable_seqscan
----------------
off
(1 row)
loff=# explain analyze select f.id, f.name, doc.id, doc.owner_id, doc.name
FROM document doc left outer join folder f ON doc.folder_id = f.id
WHERE doc.folder_id is not null OR doc.owner_id = 1;
QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hash Left Join (cost=103.08..141.89 rows=1095 width=76) (actual time=0.052..0.057 rows=3 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (doc.folder_id = f.id)
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on document doc (cost=21.10..44.85 rows=1095 width=44) (actual time=0.027..0.028 rows=3 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: ((folder_id IS NOT NULL) OR (owner_id = 1))
-> BitmapOr (cost=21.10..21.10 rows=1100 width=0) (actual time=0.018..0.018 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on document_folder_idx (cost=0.00..16.36 rows=1094 width=0) (actual time=0.012..0.012 rows=2 loops=1)
Index Cond: (folder_id IS NOT NULL)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on document_owner_idx (cost=0.00..4.20 rows=6 width=0) (actual time=0.005..0.005 rows=2 loops=1)
Index Cond: (owner_id = 1)
-> Hash (cost=66.60..66.60 rows=1230 width=36) (actual time=0.011..0.011 rows=2 loops=1)
Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 1kB
-> Index Scan using folder_pkey on folder f (cost=0.15..66.60 rows=1230 width=36) (actual time=0.005..0.006 rows=2 loops=1)
Total runtime: 0.125 ms
(13 rows)
FROM document doc left outer join folder f ON doc.folder_id = f.id
WHERE doc.folder_id is not null OR doc.owner_id = 1;
QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hash Left Join (cost=103.08..141.89 rows=1095 width=76) (actual time=0.052..0.057 rows=3 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (doc.folder_id = f.id)
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on document doc (cost=21.10..44.85 rows=1095 width=44) (actual time=0.027..0.028 rows=3 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: ((folder_id IS NOT NULL) OR (owner_id = 1))
-> BitmapOr (cost=21.10..21.10 rows=1100 width=0) (actual time=0.018..0.018 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on document_folder_idx (cost=0.00..16.36 rows=1094 width=0) (actual time=0.012..0.012 rows=2 loops=1)
Index Cond: (folder_id IS NOT NULL)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on document_owner_idx (cost=0.00..4.20 rows=6 width=0) (actual time=0.005..0.005 rows=2 loops=1)
Index Cond: (owner_id = 1)
-> Hash (cost=66.60..66.60 rows=1230 width=36) (actual time=0.011..0.011 rows=2 loops=1)
Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 1kB
-> Index Scan using folder_pkey on folder f (cost=0.15..66.60 rows=1230 width=36) (actual time=0.005..0.006 rows=2 loops=1)
Total runtime: 0.125 ms
(13 rows)
In 9.4-beta2 it results in an index-scan with a filter:
andreak=# select version();
version
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 9.4beta2 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2, 64-bit
(1 row)
version
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 9.4beta2 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2, 64-bit
(1 row)
andreak=# show enable_seqscan ;
enable_seqscan
----------------
off
(1 row)
enable_seqscan
----------------
off
(1 row)
andreak=# explain analyze select f.id, f.name, doc.id, doc.owner_id, doc.name
FROM document doc left outer join folder f ON doc.folder_id = f.id
WHERE doc.folder_id is not null OR doc.owner_id = 1;
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.28..18.92 rows=4 width=76) (actual time=0.032..0.044 rows=3 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using document_folder_idx on document doc (cost=0.13..6.20 rows=4 width=44) (actual time=0.018..0.024 rows=3 loops=1)
Filter: ((folder_id IS NOT NULL) OR (owner_id = 1))
Rows Removed by Filter: 1
-> Index Scan using folder_pkey on folder f (cost=0.15..3.17 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=0.003..0.004 rows=1 loops=3)
Index Cond: (doc.folder_id = id)
Planning time: 0.260 ms
Execution time: 0.094 ms
(8 rows)
FROM document doc left outer join folder f ON doc.folder_id = f.id
WHERE doc.folder_id is not null OR doc.owner_id = 1;
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.28..18.92 rows=4 width=76) (actual time=0.032..0.044 rows=3 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using document_folder_idx on document doc (cost=0.13..6.20 rows=4 width=44) (actual time=0.018..0.024 rows=3 loops=1)
Filter: ((folder_id IS NOT NULL) OR (owner_id = 1))
Rows Removed by Filter: 1
-> Index Scan using folder_pkey on folder f (cost=0.15..3.17 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=0.003..0.004 rows=1 loops=3)
Index Cond: (doc.folder_id = id)
Planning time: 0.260 ms
Execution time: 0.094 ms
(8 rows)
I have quite large dataset (and some additional joins) in my prod-data and hoped that I could solve this with one index-scan on an index on document-table to avoid 2 index-scans and OR-ing the results.
Thanks for help!
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963