Re: [GENERAL] pglogical vs. built-in logical replication in pg-10 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andreas Joseph Krogh
Subject Re: [GENERAL] pglogical vs. built-in logical replication in pg-10
Date
Msg-id VisenaEmail.17.969f597d04a91a24.15cd0e5d6b1@tc7-visena
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] pglogical vs. built-in logical replication in pg-10  (Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>)
List pgsql-general
På torsdag 22. juni 2017 kl. 17:10:40, skrev Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>:
[snip]
What's so better in LO's VS bytea? You do a lot updates on the binary data, changing only parts of it?
 
BYTEA really sucks when dealing with large objects and streaming to clients (JDBC). The only solution (I've found) which doesn't explode in memory-usage is using LOs (OIDs). Note that we're dealing with multi-gigabytes objects, which need to be "transactional safe" (hence stored in the DB).
 
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
 
Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pglogical vs. built-in logical replication in pg-10
Next
From: Ray Stell
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL] 10beta1 role