RE: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)
Subject RE: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)
Date
Msg-id TYCPR01MB837393BA666815647F35DDF8ED0F9@TYCPR01MB8373.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,


On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 6:15 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 at 12:14, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The thread title doesn't really convey the topic under discussion, so
> > changed it. IIRC, this has been mentioned by others as well in the
> > thread.
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 7:21 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Few comments:
> > > 1) I feel if the user has specified a long delay there is a chance
> > > that replication may not continue if the replication slot falls
> > > behind the current LSN by more than max_slot_wal_keep_size. I feel
> > > we should add this reference in the documentation of min_apply_delay
> > > as the replication will not continue in this case.
> > >
> >
> > This makes sense to me.
Modified accordingly. The updated patch is in [1].


> >
> > > 2) I also noticed that if we have to shut down the publisher server
> > > with a long min_apply_delay configuration, the publisher server
> > > cannot be stopped as the walsender waits for the data to be
> > > replicated. Is this behavior ok for the server to wait in this case?
> > > If this behavior is ok, we could add a log message as it is not very
> > > evident from the log files why the server could not be shut down.
> > >
> >
> > I think for this case, the behavior should be the same as for physical
> > replication. Can you please check what is behavior for the case you
> > are worried about in physical replication? Note, we already have a
> > similar parameter for recovery_min_apply_delay for physical
> > replication.
> 
> In the case of physical replication by setting recovery_min_apply_delay, I
> noticed that both primary and standby nodes were getting stopped successfully
> immediately after the stop server command. In case of logical replication, stop
> server fails:
> pg_ctl -D publisher -l publisher.log stop -c waiting for server to shut
> down...............................................................
> failed
> pg_ctl: server does not shut down
> 
> In case of logical replication, the server does not get stopped because the
> walsender process is not able to exit:
> ps ux | grep walsender
> vignesh  1950789 75.3  0.0 8695216 22284 ?       Rs   11:51   1:08
> postgres: walsender vignesh [local] START_REPLICATION
Thanks, I could reproduce this and I'll update this point in a subsequent version.



[1] -
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/TYCPR01MB8373775ECC6972289AF8CB30ED0F9%40TYCPR01MB8373.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com



Best Regards,
    Takamichi Osumi


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: Global Unique Index