On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 8:49 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've attached an updated patch.
>
> While trying this idea, I noticed there is no API to get the length of
> dlist, as we discussed offlist. Alternative idea was to use List
> (T_XidList) but I'm not sure it's a great idea since deleting an xid
> from the list is O(N), we need to implement list_delete_xid, and we
> need to make sure allocating list node in the reorder buffer context.
> So in the patch, I added a variable, catchange_ntxns, to keep track of
> the length of the dlist. Please review it.
>
Thanks for your patch. Here are some comments on the master patch.
1.
In catalog_change_snapshot.spec, should we use "RUNNING_XACTS record" instead of
"RUNNING_XACT record" / "XACT_RUNNING record" in the comment?
2.
+ * Since catchange.xip is sorted, we find the lower bound of
+ * xids that sill are interesting.
Typo?
"sill" -> "still"
3.
+ * This array is set once when restoring the snapshot, xids are removed
+ * from the array when decoding xl_running_xacts record, and then eventually
+ * becomes an empty.
+ /* catchange list becomes an empty */
+ pfree(builder->catchange.xip);
+ builder->catchange.xip = NULL;
Should "becomes an empty" be modified to "becomes empty"?
4.
+ * changes that are smaller than ->xmin. Those won't ever get checked via
+ * the ->committed array and ->catchange, respectively. The committed xids will
Should we change
"the ->committed array and ->catchange"
to
"the ->committed or ->catchange array"
?
Regards,
Shi yu
