RE: pg_upgrade's interaction with pg_resetwal seems confusing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Subject RE: pg_upgrade's interaction with pg_resetwal seems confusing
Date
Msg-id TYAPR01MB5866DAFE000F8677C49ACD66F5D8A@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade's interaction with pg_resetwal seems confusing  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dear Alvaro,

Thank you for updating! PSA new version.

> Note that this patch falsifies the comment in SetNextObjectId that
> taking the lock is pro forma only -- it no longer is, since in upgrade
> mode there can be multiple subprocesses running -- so I think it should
> be updated.

Indeed, some comments were updated.

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED



Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Suraj Kharage
Date:
Subject: Re: Server crash on RHEL 9/s390x platform against PG16
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: pg_upgrade's interaction with pg_resetwal seems confusing