RE: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Subject RE: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format
Date
Msg-id TYAPR01MB586666B5C9D0F1C99E91117BF5AD9@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format  (Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format  (Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dear Melih,

If we do not have to treat the case Shi pointed out[1] as code-level, I agreed to
same option binary because it is simpler. I read the use-cases addressed by Bharath[2]
and I cannot find advantage for case 1 and 3 expect the case that binary functions
are not implemented.
Previously I said that the combination of "copy_format = binary" and "copy_data = false"
seemed strange[3], but this approach could solve it and other related ones
automatically.

I think we should add description to doc that it is more likely happen to fail
the initial copy user should enable binary format after synchronization if
tables have original datatype.

[1]:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/OSZPR01MB6310B58F069FF8E148B247FDFDA49%40OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACXiUsJoXt%3DfMpa4yYseB5h3un_syVh-J3RxL4-6r9Dx2A%40mail.gmail.com
[3]:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/TYAPR01MB5866968CF42FBAB73E8EEDF8F5AA9%40TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-superuser subscription owners