RE: New statistics for tuning WAL buffer size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com
Subject RE: New statistics for tuning WAL buffer size
Date
Msg-id TYAPR01MB299012A0BA63D1ABB58D7B1EFE5D0@TYAPR01MB2990.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: New statistics for tuning WAL buffer size  (Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses RE: New statistics for tuning WAL buffer size  (Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
From: Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com>
> If my understanding is correct, we have to measure the performance
> impact first.
> Do you know HariBabu is now trying to solve it? If not, I will try to
> modify patches to apply HEAD.

No, he's not doing it anymore.  It'd be great if you could resume it.  However, I recommend sharing your understanding
aboutwhat were the issues with those two threads and how you're trying to solve them.  Was the performance overhead the
blockerin both of the threads? 


Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiro Ikeda
Date:
Subject: RE: New statistics for tuning WAL buffer size
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Creating foreign key on partitioned table is too slow