RE: Patch for migration of the pg_commit_ts directory - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Subject RE: Patch for migration of the pg_commit_ts directory
Date
Msg-id TY7PR01MB14554C95074AC7FD53D0E5246F587A@TY7PR01MB14554.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Patch for migration of the pg_commit_ts directory  ("Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

> I didn't quite understand what I needed to do. 
> My assumptions:
> 1. You need to download the postgresql master branch and create a patch file on it.

This is correct. I periodically checked the commitfest app [1], and it has
reported [Needs rebase!] for weeks. Now it could be applied cleanly and tests
could be passed.

> 2. Replace the 2025 with 2026 header comment in all сhangeable patch files.

Since I cannot follow the sentence, let me clarify my understanding.

Basically, the copyright notation is maintained by the PostgreSQL community;
nothing for us to do. They are updated at the beginning of the year [2].
If you are proposing to add new files, however, they must contain the copyright
and be updated in the new year. It's not yet included in the codebase and is out
of scope for the community's maintenance.

Please ask me anything if you have more questions :-).

[1]: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6119/ 
[2]: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/451c43974f8e199097d97624a4952ad0973cea61

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Niyaz Hazigaleyev
Date:
Subject: Re: Use Postgres as meson wrap subproject
Next
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: Refactor query normalization into core query jumbling