RE: Adding REPACK [concurrently] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
Subject RE: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Date
Msg-id TY4PR01MB1771838FAEA8614A388EF138E94152@TY4PR01MB17718.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Saturday, May 30, 2026 6:25 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2026-May-27, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) wrote:
> 
> > I tried a bit, and the test complexity and speed (< 1s) appear to be
> > within acceptable limits. I'm attaching 0002 as a reference test.
> >
> > 0001 remains unchanged.
> 
> Pushed 0001, in two parts.  I rewrote the comment in
> decode_concurrent_changes() though, hope it ended up okay.

Thank you for pushing the patches ! The comments look good to me.

In the original 0002 test patch, I realized that I missed to drop existing slots
from previous tests (I did locally but missed to merge into the patch), which
also prevented WAL removal, sorry for that. Attached is the fixed test patch.

Best Regards,
Hou zj

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Row pattern recognition
Next
From: Henson Choi
Date:
Subject: Re: Row pattern recognition