That makes perfect sense, now that you have explained it. I just didn't pick up on that from the text as written.
--
D. Richard Hipp
drh@sqlite.org
On Wednesday, October 16th, 2024 at 9:22 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2024-Oct-15, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>
> > The documentation does not say what happens if you do "CLUSTER tablename"
> > and omit the USING clause, which is shown as optional in the BNF, if I'm
> > reading it right. Does CLUSTER use the PRIMARY KEY in that case? What if
> > no PRIMARY KEY is specified?
>
>
> The table is clustered on the index that was previously selected as the
> cluster index (either by running "CLUSTER table ON idx" or by doing
> ALTER TABLE tab CLUSTER ON idx"). If no index is selected, an error is
> thrown.
>
> The docs explain it this way:
>
> When a table is clustered, PostgreSQL remembers which index it was clustered
> by. The form CLUSTER table_name reclusters the table using the same index as
> before. You can also use the CLUSTER or SET WITHOUT CLUSTER forms of ALTER
> TABLE to set the index to be used for future cluster operations, or to clear
> any previous setting.
>
> I'm not sure if we need to make this clearer. It's perfectly clear to
> me, but then I already knew what I wanted to read ...
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
> "After a quick R of TFM, all I can say is HOLY CR** THAT IS COOL! PostgreSQL was
> amazing when I first started using it at 7.2, and I'm continually astounded by
> learning new features and techniques made available by the continuing work of
> the development team."
> Berend Tober, http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-08/msg01009.php
