Hi, Chao
On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 at 15:29, Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 13, 2026, at 15:05, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi, hackers
>>
>> While reading smgr.h, I noticed an inconsistent type usage in
>> pgaio_io_set_target_smgr(). Currently the function is declared as:
>>
>> extern void pgaio_io_set_target_smgr(PgAioHandle *ioh,
>> SMgrRelationData *smgr,
>> ForkNumber forknum,
>> BlockNumber blocknum,
>> int nblocks,
>>
>> However, SMgrRelation is defined as "typedef SMgrRelationData * SMgrRelation;",
>> and all other functions in the smgr subsystem use SMgrRelation as the parameter
>> type.
>>
>> To keep the code consistent with the rest of the smgr API, this patch changes
>> the parameter from SMgrRelationData * to SMgrRelation in both the definition
>> and declaration.
>>
>> This is purely a style/consistency cleanup with no functional change.
>>
>> Thoughts? Is this change acceptable?
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Japin Li
>> ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.
>>
>> <v1-0001-Use-SMgrRelation-instead-of-SMgrRelationData-in-p.patch>
>
> pgaio_io_set_target_smgr doesn’t update smgr, so, instead of “SMgrRelation”, I think it’s better to change the type
to"const SMgrRelationData *”.
Thanks for the review! Makes sense — I've updated the patch to v2.
--
Regards,
Japin Li
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.