Frankly, I’m not certain, I believe the developers are using a messaging intermediary.
pg
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 5:19 PM
To: Godfrin, Philippe E <Philippe.Godfrin@nov.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Numeric data types
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:14:48PM +0000, Godfrin, Philippe E wrote:
> Fabulous, thanks much.
You still have not told us how you are transfering the data, so we can
be sure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 4:56 PM
> To: Godfrin, Philippe E <Philippe.Godfrin@nov.com>
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Numeric data types
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 05:32:23PM +0000, Godfrin, Philippe E wrote:
> > Thanks Bruce, I suppose you mean n32 -> n64 OK, but n64->n32 chance of 32-bit
> > overflow…
>
> Uh, I was thinking that your 32-bit values could roll over and the other
> end would be confused, but I can also see the 64-bit going above the
> 32-bit range. As long as everything stays < 32-bits, you should be
> fine. We don't transfer binary values very often.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
>
> The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
>
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
