Hi Albe,
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:31:35 +0100
> From: Albe Laurenz <all@adv.magwien.gv.at>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
>
> >>> If libldap_r.so does require the same libs, please add
> $EXTRA_LDAP_LIBS
> >>> to the 'LDAP_LIBS_FE="-lldap_r"' line as well.
> >>
> >> Actually, I did that in the patch-as-committed. It seems to me that
> >> it's probably harmless even if not needed.
> >
> > I have tried --with-thread-safety and configure fails on ldap check
> > because for some reason CTHREAD_FLAGS (-Kpthread for UW) is missing
> > on compile command, although present before that. I can't find why
>
> You mean PTHREAD_FLAGS, right?
>
Nope,I mean PTHREAD_CFLAGS witch is defined in src/templates/unixware
> If it is present in line 1118, it should also be present in line 1133.
>
> Can you verify that the part on configure.in between 1065 and 1118,
> -Kpthread is correctly set on Unixware?
>
It is defined, my guts felling is that AC_SUBSTs lines 1470,1471 do
something weird.
> If not, thread support for Unixware is probebly broken.
>
It is, because when searching for ldap_r succeeds by forcing
PTHREAD_CFLAGS to be used, configure still fails when testing for thread
safety compiling src/test/thread/thread_test.c.
This fails because unixware's sigwait has only one arg although (according
to doc you can see at http://www.pyrenet.fr:8458) it's thread safe...
> If yes, something strange is going on.
>
indeed
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>
Best regards
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
