Re: Bug or Feature? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Olivier PRENANT
Subject Re: Bug or Feature?
Date
Msg-id Pine.UW2.4.21.0203042217360.10589-100000@server.pyrenet.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug or Feature?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi, Tom,

Thanks for replying.
You were right (of course) I don't need timestamp on this app...
However I tried to change the column type on 7.1.3 to ease the
swith... AFAIK, there's no timestamp without timezone on 7.1.3; Please
tell me there's another way other than editing pg_dump by hand... That
would loose time and would call for errors...

Regards,On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Olivier PRENANT <ohp@pyrenet.fr> writes:
> > CREATE INDEX deb ON xxxx USING btree (date(timestamp coll) date_ops);
> > on 7.2 I have an error message saying that functrional indexes must but
> > made ISCACHABLE.
> 
> See previous discussion of this identical problem.  The fact is that
> such an index is dangerous, because it depends on the timezone setting.
> 
> You might want to make the underlying column be timestamp without time
> zone.
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org
> 

-- 
Olivier PRENANT             Tel:    +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
Quartier d'Harraud Turrou           +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE                      +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE                      Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Rod Taylor"
Date:
Subject: Re: Database Caching
Next
From: "Rod Taylor"
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] Uniqueness of rule, constraint, and trigger names