Re: [GENERAL] Re: [SQL] sql 92 support in postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Oleg Broytmann
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Re: [SQL] sql 92 support in postgres
Date
Msg-id Pine.SOL2.3.96.SK.990326125112.26085A-100000@sun.med.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [SQL] sql 92 support in postgres  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
List pgsql-general
Hi!

On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> As to mySQL, I've never used it, but I understand it's a very fast, but

   I had some experience with MySQL, and yes - it is very fast.

> limited, subset of SQL. The biggest drawback I see referenced is the
> lack of transaction support.

   What is worse, authors of MySQL claimed that transactions and triggers
would never find its way into MySQL, as it slows down every SQL query.

> --
> Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu>
> NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
> Computer and Information Technology Institute
> Rice University, 6100 S. Main St.,  Houston, TX 77005

Oleg.
----
    Oleg Broytmann     http://members.xoom.com/phd2/     phd2@earthling.net
           Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Ty Augustine"
Date:
Subject: How do I "Insert" using a type member?
Next
From: Stuart Rison
Date:
Subject: Are postgreSQL views UPDATEable?