Re: [ADMIN] re: binary/build woes, procedural question - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Oleg Broytmann
Subject Re: [ADMIN] re: binary/build woes, procedural question
Date
Msg-id Pine.SOL2.3.96.SK.981014184202.27023C-100000@sun.med.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to re: binary/build woes, procedural question  ("Gilley, Charles H." <Charles.Gilley@glenayre.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Hi!

On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Gilley, Charles H. wrote:
> Well, I'm being stymied from all directions in getting 6.3.2 to run on my
> Ultrasparc.
> The 6.3.2 binaries have a bug with the \dt command, consequently, ODBC
> cannot
> see any tables.  So I need to recompile which is itself another problem,
> hence my question:
>
> If I obtain the 6.3.2 sources, MUST I apply all patches to the code prior to
> compilation?

   I have successfully compiled and now is running 6.3.2 without any
additional patches. Later I've applied and restart postgres with locale
patch.
   No problems yet.

   Sun Ultra-1, Solaris 2.5.1, gcc 2.8.1

Oleg.
----
    Oleg Broytmann  National Research Surgery Centre  http://sun.med.ru/~phd/
           Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Gilley, Charles H."
Date:
Subject: re: binary/build woes, procedural question
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Why my index does not increase performance?