Re: [GENERAL] Limitation - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dustin Sallings
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Limitation
Date
Msg-id Pine.SGI.3.95.990624173604.1581B-100000@bleu.west.spy.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Limitation  ("John Huttley" <john@mwk.co.nz>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, John Huttley wrote:

    Heh, that sounds kinda pleasant...it's so good you mistook it for
a commercial RDBMS.  :)

# most of the heavy work is done by about 4 people. Actually there are
# things in libpq -large object support- I will investigate. Thats very
# much nibbling around the edge.

    I've often thought about donig some work on the BLOB support, the
backend storage parts, but for my main project that would use them, I've
got pretty far into splitting and encoding the data.  That's actually how
we do it in our Sybase databases because BLOBs are just too hard to deal
with with regards to replication, etc...

--
SA, beyond.com           My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
|    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "John Huttley"
Date:
Subject: Fsync and Linux
Next
From: "Ansley, Michael"
Date:
Subject: