Re: [GENERAL] non-Transaction logging - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dustin Sallings
Subject Re: [GENERAL] non-Transaction logging
Date
Msg-id Pine.SGI.3.95.990223094707.9453C-100000@bleu.west.spy.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Transaction logging  (jim@reptiles.org (Jim Mercer))
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Jim Mercer wrote:

# on a slightly different tact, it would be a good thing(tm) if postmaster
# and the postgres backends used syslog for logging debug and other
# information.
#
# i've tried enabling debug via the postmaster command, and haven't ever
# seen anything overly useful.

    For this type of logging, I pipe my postmaster to logger.

--
SA, beyond.com           My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
|    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: jim@reptiles.org (Jim Mercer)
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Transaction logging
Next
From: "Daryl W. Dunbar"
Date:
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] Transaction logging