On Mon, 29 Jun 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, Vadim Mikheev wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > So we will just need to re-create indexes. Sounds OK to me, but
> > > frankly, I am not sure what the objection to dump/reload is.
> >
> > It takes too long time to reload big tables...
>
> I have to agree here...the one application that *I* really use
> this for is an accounting server...any downtime is unacceptable, because
> the whole system revolves around the database backend.
>
> Take a look at Michael Richards application (a search engine)
> where it has several *million* rows, and that isn't just one table.
> Michael, how long would it take to dump and reload that?
>
> How many ppl *don't* upgrade because of how expensive it would be
> for them to do, considering that their applications "work now"?
I cringe when it comes time to upgrade and now with the main site getting
~1000 hits/day I can't have the downtime (this web site is really
seasonal). Not only is there dump/reload to do, I also have to make sure
to recompile the cgi stuff when libpq changes.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2
Online Searchable Campground Listings http://www.camping-usa.com
"There is no outfit less entitled to lecture me about bloat
than the federal government" -- Tony Snow
==========================================================================
