Re: Urgent need of (paid) PostgreSQL support in New - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ricardo Ryoiti S. Junior
Subject Re: Urgent need of (paid) PostgreSQL support in New
Date
Msg-id Pine.NEB.4.44.0212110903190.27069-100000@unix-svr01.interno
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Urgent need of (paid) PostgreSQL support in New  ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
Responses Re: Urgent need of (paid) PostgreSQL support in New
List pgsql-general
    Hi,

On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:

> > OS caching is generally considered a waste of resource in databases.
> > Try to allocate as much as possible to shared buffers and set OS
> > caching to minimum.
>
> That is an exactly opposite of the truth. Leave as much for OS cache and
> do minimum use of shared buffers.
>
> Initially upping the shared buffers help but at some pointthe advantage starts
> to disappear. Decide that figure with trial and error but certainly it will be
> around 100-200MB for most cases..

    Are there any studies around this? I remember that there where
other people saying the same thing. But at least logically, it seems that
the database server should know better than the OS what it needs cached or
not. Also, doesn't the db buffer cache requires a bit lower "overload" for
data to be accessed?


    []'s
    Ricardo.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Ricardo Ryoiti S. Junior"
Date:
Subject: Re: Urgent need of (paid) PostgreSQL support in New
Next
From: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Date:
Subject: Re: Urgent need of (paid) PostgreSQL support in New