Re: tuple concurrently updated - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Curt Sampson
Subject Re: tuple concurrently updated
Date
Msg-id Pine.NEB.4.44.0207290138260.28234-100000@angelic.cynic.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: tuple concurrently updated  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Other than the fact that the second CREATE INDEX fails and rolls back,
> there's no problem ;-)

Agh!

So what, in the current version of postgres, are my options for
doing parallel index builds?

cjs
-- 
Curt Sampson  <cjs@cynic.net>   +81 90 7737 2974   http://www.netbsd.org   Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're
alllight.  --XTC
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: tuple concurrently updated
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about LWLockAcquire's use of semaphores instead of spinlocks