Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release
Date
Msg-id Pine.NEB.3.95.980416095334.10565F-100000@hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> > > My question is, "Do we disable the HAVING clause for 6.3.2?"  The
> > > bugs are serious and cause crashes.
> > > Do we disable it?
> > Yes...but disabling means that it *will not* be available until
> > v6.4...no v6.3.3 :)
>
> Hmm. What is the downside to leaving it in with caveats or "stay away"
> warnings in the release notes? Since it didn't exist as a feature
> before, the only downside I see is somewhat increased traffic on the
> questions list...

    I liked the one suggestion about having it as a compile time
option until its fixed...



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jose' Soares Da Silva"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] ecpg patch