Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oleg Bartunov
Subject Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.64.1102130049390.278@sn.sai.msu.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Oops, thank for remind !

Oleg
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Tom Lane wrote:

> Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
>> btree_gist is essentially required for exclusion constraints to be
>> useful in a practical way.
>
>> In fact, can you submit it for the next commitfest to be included in
>> core? That would allow range types and exclusion constraints to be used
>> out-of-the-box in 9.2.
>
>> Only if you think it's reasonable to put it in core, of course. If
>> extensions are easy enough to install, maybe that's not really
>> necessary.
>
> btree_gist is entirely unready to be included in core.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-10/msg00104.php
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
>
    Regards,        Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling