On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In my understanding
>>> this was always enough to submit code. User's documentation is depend on
>>> discussion and review and can be added later
>>> before releasing beta.
>>
>> Several people have said this lately, but it doesn't match what I've
>> seen of our practice over the last year and a half;
>
> Perhaps the confusion is that we often say not to worry about the
> quality of the English in the documentation. That's because it's easy
> for a reviewer to fix up the English but not so easy to figure out
> what you intend the behaviour to be.
English + SGML stuff. We usually provide information in plain text, posted
in -hackers and published in my wiki. I don't remember, that there were
no information about patches.
Regards, Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
