On Thu, 26 Nov 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
> Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes:
>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I think you altered the wrong function. The function underlying
>>> point <@ box is on_pb() not pt_contained_box ... in fact, I don't
>>> even see a function named that.
>
>> sorry, I forgot to say, that I created operator
>
> Unless you changed search_path, I think the parser would have preferred
> the built-in point <@ box operator to one in "public". Are you sure
> your code was being used at all?
oops, you were right. Sorry, for noise.
Regards, Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
