Re: What is happening on buildfarm member dugong - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sergey E. Koposov
Subject Re: What is happening on buildfarm member dugong
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.64.0709112054270.9144@lnfm1.sai.msu.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What is happening on buildfarm member dugong  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: What is happening on buildfarm member dugong
Re: What is happening on buildfarm member dugong
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>> NOTICE:  database "contrib_regression" does not exist, skipping
>> ERROR:  too many active hash_seq_search scans
>> ERROR:  too many active hash_seq_search scans
>> ERROR:  too many active hash_seq_search scans
>> ERROR:  too many active hash_seq_search scans

With hash_seq_search ERROR, it was partially a false alarm. I've had some 
old postgres daemon hanging around and writing that to the log. 
Although I remember seeing that hash_seq_search message recently when 
dealing with this bug, it does not show up in the course of standard 
regression tests.

regards,    Sergey
*******************************************************************
Sergey E. Koposov
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy/Cambridge Institute for Astronomy/Sternberg Astronomical Institute
Tel: +49-6221-528-349
Web: http://lnfm1.sai.msu.ru/~math
E-mail: math@sai.msu.ru


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: What is happening on buildfarm member dugong
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings