Yes, but the implication is that large databases probably don't update
every row between backup periods.
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/17/07 11:04, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> Ultimately though, once your database gets past a certain size, you
>> really want to be using PITR and not pg_dump as your main recovery
>> strategy.
>
> But doesn't that just replay each transaction? It must manage the
> index nodes during each update/delete/insert, and multiple UPDATE
> statements means that you hit the same page over and over again.
>
> - --
> Ron Johnson, Jr.
> Jefferson LA USA
>
> Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
> Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFGTL+3S9HxQb37XmcRAqGyAKDYxtahXCuZD0WkNV8fY8p48Wcn2gCgk3hQ
> ExVOZQBDuVVafTqB1XD/Gno=
> =6Pzi
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
