Re: insert performance for win32 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Qingqing Zhou
Subject Re: insert performance for win32
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58.0511031523440.15487@josh.db
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: insert performance for win32  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
List pgsql-performance

On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> > Both win32 send/recv have pgwin32_poll_signals() in them.
> > This is glorified WaitForSingleObjectEx on global
> > pgwin32_signal_event.  This is probably part of the problem.
> > Can we work some of the same magic you put into check
> > interrupts macro?
> >
>
> Uh, we already do that, don't we?
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/port/win32/
> socket.c?rev=1.10
> has:
>

Yeah, we did this. I am thinking of just use simple mechanism of the win32
sockets, which could not pick up signals, but I would like to see if there
is any difference -- do you think there is any point to try this?

Regards,
Qingqing

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Qingqing Zhou"
Date:
Subject: Re: insert performance for win32
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: insert performance for win32