Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Qingqing Zhou
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58.0510211702250.25444@josh.db
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 

>
> Also, I have a small style question - why use a nested if instead of
> just saying
>
>   if (UNBLOCKED_SIGNAL_QUEUE() &&
> WaitForSingleObjectEx(pgwin32_signal_event,0,TRUE) == WAIT_OBJECT_0)
>

Yeah, this works but IMHO that style states things clearer,

Regards,
Qingqing

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Qingqing Zhou
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance tweak