Re: WAL/PITR additional items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gavin Sherry
Subject Re: WAL/PITR additional items
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58.0504210932290.27355@linuxworld.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL/PITR additional items  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: WAL/PITR additional items
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Tom Lane wrote:

> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > 2. PreallocXlogFiles to run from a separate process to make it
> > effective, as discussed last year.
>
> What?

The discussion Simon is refering to came up during the 8.0 beta IIRC. The
problem was that we were not allocating xlogs quickly enough under
heavy workloads and there was some discussion about the bgwriter taking
over this task since it could assess the need for new xlogs more often.

Gavin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for background vacuum full/cluster
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL/PITR additional items