On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> I preferred Simon's idea of not trying to produce a warning for pages
> when we've detected relation overflow.
Sounds good. I'll make that update.
Should the relation overflow be a WARNING or a LOG? It sounds like
if you have that problem it's almost certainly a problem, right?
> Making it a LOG rather than WARNING does address the issue of being
> too much in-your-face for an uncertain condition, though.
Great.