Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gavin Sherry
Subject Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58.0410080943280.20772@linuxworld.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Gavin Sherry wrote:
> > We cannot use named parameter notation with functions due to
> > overloading. Disregarding the idea of default values, consider:
> >
> > create function foo(i int, j int) ...
> > create function foo(j int, i int) ...
>
> That just means we cannot use the parameter name as a distinguishing
> factor in the overloading scheme.  Which certainly makes a lot of sense
> to me.

The above example was a mistake. See other examples in the thread.

Thanks,

Gavin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1
Next
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1