On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Stephen Frost wrote:
Hi,
> > why is this? This is very limiting ...
>
> It's 2TB...
Yeah, you're right. I didn't take into account, that you multiply it with
1kb - my fault.
2TB is enough - at the moment at least. But implementing it in 64 from now
on could save a lot of work in the future ...
> It sounded to me like it might be a limitation forced by some other part
> of postgres, but I don't really know... Good question though.
I'm not sure about it either - anyone?
Greetings, Klaus
--
Full Name : Klaus Naumann | (http://www.mgnet.de/) (Germany)
Phone / FAX : ++49/177/7862964 | E-Mail: (kn@mgnet.de)
