Re: Setting Shared Buffers , Effective Cache, Sort Mem - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Ron Mayer
Subject Re: Setting Shared Buffers , Effective Cache, Sort Mem
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58.0404231506310.5473@one
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Setting Shared Buffers , Effective Cache, Sort Mem Parameters  (Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>)
Responses Re: Setting Shared Buffers , Effective Cache, Sort Mem  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Manfred Koizar wrote:
>
> Setting shared_buffers to half your available memory is the worst thing
> you can do.  You would end up caching exactly the same set of blocks in
> the internal buffers and in the OS cache, thus effectively making one of
> the caches useless.

One minor detail...  You wouldn't really cache the _exact_ same blocks
because cache-hits in shared-buffers (on the most frequently accessed
pages) would let the OS cache some other pages in it's cache.

But in my experience Manfred's right that there's no benefit and
some penalty to making shared_buffers so large it takes a significant
piece away from the OS's caching.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Manfred Koizar
Date:
Subject: Re: Setting Shared Buffers , Effective Cache, Sort Mem Parameters
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Setting Shared Buffers , Effective Cache, Sort Mem