Re: Fwd: Re: [PERFORM] MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Gavin Sherry
Subject Re: Fwd: Re: [PERFORM] MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58.0404221852310.2034@linuxworld.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fwd: Re: [PERFORM] MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks  (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Gavin Sherry wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
> >
> > > Perhaps one of the advocay team will pick up the batton?
> > He is using COPY to load the data...I can't think of any earthly reason
> > why it takes > 1d to load 10gb data...probabaly all boils down to
> > default shared buffer setting.  I don't even really consider this
> > 'optimizing', just basic configuring to match the software to the
> > machine.
>
> The indexes should be created after the data is loaded. There is no
> mention of VACUUM, ANALYZE or tuning.
>
> I've generated the work load over night and am going to have a quick look
> at it when I get a minute.

With a 10 GB work load on an old Duron, 512 MB ram, IDE disk, it took 30
odd minutes to load the data and 9 hours to load indexes. Unfortunately
I'm out of disk! I'll run the 1 GB work load instead when I get some time
but I can imagine that an ANALYZE will make a dramatic different to those
query times.

Gavin

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Linux User Expo - Requests for Assistance URGENT
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [PERFORM] MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks