> > (1) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:36:55 +0200 (CEST)
> > Subject: [PATCHES] aclitem accessor functions
>
> I thought Peter didn't like it.
He asked 'why' I needed it. I answered his question.
He may or may not agree, I don't know!
> Would you repost and we can review it again.
Ok.
> > (2) Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 19:35:57 +0200 (CEST)
> > Subject: [PATCHES] 'information_schema' considered a system schema
>
> I don't remember that one at all. Would you repost?
Ok.
> Basically, what happens on these patches is if someone says there is a
> problem, and you reply but it isn't clear that the problem is refuted or
> addressed,
That's what I do, but I can only "argue", not "refute" or "address"
issues. Whether it is refuted or addressed is in the head of the decider.
--
Fabien Coelho - coelho@cri.ensmp.fr
