Re: notice about costly ri checks (2) - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: notice about costly ri checks (2)
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58.0403051626430.12725@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: notice about costly ri checks (2)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: notice about costly ri checks (2)
List pgsql-patches
> The reason I think we have to mention the constraint name is that you
> could have a multi-column primary/foreign key, so instead of mentioning
> each column, we just mention the constraint name, which should be easy
> to identify.

Sure. See attempt (3). However it is still a "NOTICE".
Should I make version (4) with a WARNING ?

--
Fabien Coelho - coelho@cri.ensmp.fr

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: notice about costly ri checks (2)
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: notice about costly ri checks (2)