Re: SET WITHOUT OIDS and VACUUM badness? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gavin Sherry
Subject Re: SET WITHOUT OIDS and VACUUM badness?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58.0401212151380.17265@linuxworld.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to SET WITHOUT OIDS and VACUUM badness?  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: SET WITHOUT OIDS and VACUUM badness?  (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> This is what we did:
>
> 0. BEGIN;
>
> 1. ALTER TABLE ... SET WITHOUT OIDS

> 12. ROLLBACK;
>
> 13. VACUUM FULL forums_posts;

The problem here is that this conditional doesn't take into account the
change in state which the above transaction causes:
           if (onerel->rd_rel->relhasoids &&               !OidIsValid(HeapTupleGetOid(&tuple)))

Tuples inserted after step one have no (valid) OID. However, since we
rollback, the change to pg_class.relhasoids => 'f' is rolled back. The
only solution I can think of is removing the test or storing relhasoids as
a per tuple flag (argh).

Gavin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dennis Bjorklund
Date:
Subject: Re: SET WITHOUT OIDS and VACUUM badness?
Next
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: SET WITHOUT OIDS and VACUUM badness?