Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
> > > It's a constraint name. IIRC, it happens to affect all such named
> > > constraints currently. We should probably allow <tablename>.<constraint>
> > > (and <schema>.<tablename>.<constraint>) as well. Too late for 7.4, but
> > > this can happen for 7.5 if there aren't any objections.
> >
> > I object.
>
> Thanks for the helpful objection. To what do you object specifically and
> why?
I object to creating gratuitous incompatibilities with the SQL standard,
which will obstruct legitimate features down the road. The SQL standard
says it is <schema>.<constraint>.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
