Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.56.0308052200300.928@krusty.credativ.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Responses Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-general
scott.marlowe writes:

> Do we need official permission to call the language plPHP by the way?

Can someone explain to me why language handler modules for PostgreSQL are
always called "PL/Language"?  Consider if someone wrote a language binding
for Scheme, then calling that "procedural language Scheme" sounds like an
insult to me.

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_xlog question
Next
From: "Mario Weilguni"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_xlog question