Re: Passing server_encoding to the client is not future-proof - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Passing server_encoding to the client is not future-proof
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.56.0307291419140.1370@krusty.credativ.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Passing server_encoding to the client is not future-proof  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Passing server_encoding to the client is not future-proof  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Clients could probably still make use of server_encoding, though I'm
> unclear on what they'd use it for now, let alone then.  ISTM
> client_encoding is the only setting the client need deal with directly.

Then why did we add a GUC variable "server_encoding" at all?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] concurrent writes
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: an aggregate array function