On Mon, 12 May 2003, Naomi Walker wrote:
> We would be interested in replication, so reporting could be done against a
> different server than production.
And I'm interested in replication for failover purposes. Automatic
hot-failover isn't really required for my application, but a "warm"
failover that can have a mostly-up-to-date data set and be activated
within a few minutes would be very nice.
--
David.
