On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 7 Jan 2003 at 16:25, mlw wrote:
>
> > I think banner ads that build on PostgreSQL's message is a good thing.
> > A RedHat ad, maybe IBM, etc. Companies with a related purpose to the
> > PostgreSQL mission will offset some of the cost and help build the
> > cedibility of the site.
> >
> > Hotel ads and sweepstakes are a bad idea, though.
>
> I think that those who are objecting to ads on the site should follow
> the suggestion given by Josh Berkus at
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2003-01/msg00191.php
>
> In other words, stop providing suggestions as to what can be done.
> Get off your own ass and do it. In short, put up or shut up.
If I wanted to support the whole hosting operating myself with no help
from hub.org, how many gigabytes of data transfer per month would I be
looking at for (1) the main site and (2) a mirror?
Jon
