Re: User's exception plpgsql - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: User's exception plpgsql
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0507080639400.1715-100000@kix.fsv.cvut.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: User's exception plpgsql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:

> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> > BTW, do have we reached a consensus on this?
>
> Doesn't look that way --- I tend to agree with you that we could avoid
> inventing declared exceptions at all, but Pavel is definitely not happy
> with it, and AFAIR no one else has weighed in.  Maybe we need to take
> the discussion back to pghackers to draw a wider audience.
>

I am not happy (this is only half of step), but I don't expect better
discussion. My opinion is so exception variable has more possibilities,
but this solution is usefull and funkcional too. And we can introduce
exception variables later without problems if will be good time.

Discussion on pghackers was, but not too much people contributed. And
more, I don't see user's exception as big qustion this days.

>             regards, tom lane
>



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: User's exception plpgsql
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: User's exception plpgsql