Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 for RH AS - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Fabio Esposito
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 for RH AS
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0501261450360.17637-100000@cr818510-a.basement
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 for RH AS  (Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org>)
List pgsql-general
Thanks for all you imput guys.  I'll try one of the two methods soon,

F.E.


On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Fabio Esposito wrote:
>
> > I wanted to ask if anyone knows if 8.0 is available as a RH AS package?
> > Or perhaps if the rhel-es.3.0 would work on a RH AS system? I'm not much
> > of a RH guru as I was raised on Debian.
>
> If it's RHAS 3.0 (not 2.1), 3.0 RPMs will probably work.
>
> Otherwise, you can download the related SRPM
>
(http://www.postgresql.org/download/mirrors-ftp?file=binary%2Fv8.0%2Flinux%2Fsrpms%2Fredhat%2Frhel-es-3.0%2Fpostgresql-8.0.0-1PGDG.src.rpm)
>
> and run the following command:
>
> rpmbuild -bb --target i686 postgresql-8.0.0-1PGDG.src.rpm
> (--target i686 is intentional).
>
> This command will put the built RPMs on /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i686 (or to
> i386, if you don't use --target i686).
>
> Then you can install any RPMs you want.
>
> BTW, we have a mailing list on RPMs:
>
> http://lists.pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgsqlrpms-general
>
> Regards,
>
> - --
> Devrim GUNDUZ
> devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
> http://www.tdmsoft.com                         http://www.gunduz.org
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFB9nM5tl86P3SPfQ4RAnvuAJ98ABRh6Hj0Qb12ZcrEbAcMmrmfNwCfRjzr
> oW1++tx1lP9rI4x57VseiJg=
> =hy2f
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John Sidney-Woollett
Date:
Subject: Re: Splitting queries across servers
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Lower case